ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS · Live from the board · updated Jul 24, 2026

Apple Inc. (AAPL) squeeze: in a squeeze on 3 of 12 timeframes.

This page reads straight off our live squeeze board and refreshes nightly. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building on AAPL, not which way it resolves. The entry, the record, and the rank live on the board.

3
Timeframes in a squeeze now
22
Years backtested per symbol
5,852
Trades behind the system record
The clocks

AAPL across every timeframe we track.

The same name can be quiet on the daily and loaded on the intraday clocks. This is AAPL on all 12, as of the last update.

TimeframeStatusBars in squeeze
5m In a squeeze 36
15m In a squeeze 2
30m No squeeze ·
39m No squeeze ·
60m No squeeze ·
78m No squeeze ·
120m No squeeze ·
130m In a squeeze (late stage) 6
195m No squeeze ·
240m No squeeze ·
Daily No squeeze ·
Weekly No squeeze ·

Fired means the compression released. On our playbook the fire is exit territory, not an entry signal: the entry happens inside the squeeze, on the momentum turn. The learn hub explains why.

The receipts

What the squeeze has done on AAPL, honestly.

Our own historical backtest, 2006 to present, Slingshot entries on AAPL. Per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict: single names produce small samples by design, so we only show timeframes with at least 30 trades, and the verdict lives at the system level below.

TimeframeTradesWin rateProfit factorAvg hold (days)
5m 744 63.8% 1.01 16.7
15m 280 59.6% 0.77 15.1
39m 138 70.3% 1.21 10.9
30m 132 73.5% 1.79 11.5
60m 80 72.5% 1.15 9.6
78m 62 64.5% 0.94 9.6
120m 40 70.0% 1.49 9.6

Historical backtest data. Not a prediction, not financial advice. Members see the full per-symbol backtester on every name. How the backtester works.

The system record

The verdict comes from 5,852 trades, not one ticker.

Across every symbol we track, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own backtest, averaging +0.93% per trade over a roughly 17-day hold, era-stable at 67 to 71% through four very different markets. About 46% of signals never pulled back a full ATR, and those runners won roughly 92%. That distribution, not any single name, is why the setup earns a place on the board.

Questions

Straight answers on AAPL.

Is AAPL in a squeeze right now?

Yes. As of the last board update, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is in a squeeze on 3 of 12 timeframes we track. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building, not which way price will go.

Does the squeeze actually work on AAPL?

Our per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict. Across all symbols, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own historical backtest, era-stable at 67 to 71%. Small per-symbol samples are shown for transparency and are never a promise about the next trade.

See AAPL ranked against every other squeeze.

The board sorts every name by backtest edge, timeframe confluence, and trend, nightly. $99/mo, cancel anytime.