NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS · Live from the board · updated Sep 8, 2026

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) squeeze: in a squeeze on 10 timeframes.

This page reads straight off our live squeeze board and refreshes nightly. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building on BAC, not which way it resolves. The entry, the record, and the rank live on the board.

10
Timeframes in a squeeze now
22
Years backtested per symbol
5,852
Trades behind the system record
The clocks

BAC across every timeframe we track.

The same name can be quiet on the daily and loaded on the intraday clocks. This is BAC on all 12, as of the last update.

TimeframeStatusBars in squeeze
5m No squeeze ·
15m In a squeeze (late stage) 2
30m In a squeeze 9
39m In a squeeze (late stage) 7
60m In a squeeze (late stage) 11
78m In a squeeze 10
120m In a squeeze 35
130m In a squeeze 23
195m In a squeeze 10
240m In a squeeze 10
Daily In a squeeze (late stage) 4
Weekly No squeeze ·

Fired means the compression released. On our playbook the fire is exit territory, not an entry signal: the entry happens inside the squeeze, on the momentum turn. The learn hub explains why.

The receipts

What the squeeze has done on BAC, honestly.

Our own historical backtest, 2006 to present, Slingshot entries on BAC. Per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict: single names produce small samples by design, so we only show timeframes with at least 30 trades, and the verdict lives at the system level below.

TimeframeTradesWin rateProfit factorAvg hold (days)
5m 691 62.2% 1.23 16.2
15m 242 59.9% 0.86 15.6
30m 132 60.6% 1.04 14.4
39m 106 61.3% 1.09 12.8
60m 76 65.8% 1.70 9.2
78m 51 62.8% 1.08 10.3
120m 46 65.2% 0.75 9.6

Historical backtest data. Not a prediction, not financial advice. Members see the full per-symbol backtester on every name. How the backtester works.

The system record

The verdict comes from 5,852 trades, not one ticker.

Across every symbol we track, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own backtest, averaging +0.93% per trade over a roughly 17-day hold, era-stable at 67 to 71% through four very different markets. About 46% of signals never pulled back a full ATR, and those runners won roughly 92%. That distribution, not any single name, is why the setup earns a place on the board.

Questions

Straight answers on BAC.

Is BAC in a squeeze right now?

Yes. As of the last board update, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is in a squeeze on 10 of 12 timeframes we track. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building, not which way price will go.

Does the squeeze actually work on BAC?

Our per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict. Across all symbols, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own historical backtest, era-stable at 67 to 71%. Small per-symbol samples are shown for transparency and are never a promise about the next trade.

Same sector

Also in a squeeze in NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS.

All 600+ supported symbols.

See BAC ranked against every other squeeze.

The board sorts every name by backtest edge, timeframe confluence, and trend, nightly. $99/mo, cancel anytime.

Developers: get API access to our signals