This page reads straight off our live squeeze board and refreshes nightly. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building on MS, not which way it resolves. The entry, the record, and the rank live on the board.
The same name can be quiet on the daily and loaded on the intraday clocks. This is MS on all 12, as of the last update.
| Timeframe | Status | Bars in squeeze |
|---|---|---|
| 5m | No squeeze | · |
| 15m | In a squeeze (late stage) | 2 |
| 30m | In a squeeze | 4 |
| 39m | In a squeeze (late stage) | 14 |
| 60m | In a squeeze | 4 |
| 78m | No squeeze | · |
| 120m | No squeeze | · |
| 130m | In a squeeze (late stage) | 26 |
| 195m | In a squeeze | 37 |
| 240m | In a squeeze | 19 |
| Daily | In a squeeze | 50 |
| Weekly | In a squeeze (late stage) | 4 |
Fired means the compression released. On our playbook the fire is exit territory, not an entry signal: the entry happens inside the squeeze, on the momentum turn. The learn hub explains why.
Our own historical backtest, 2006 to present, Slingshot entries on MS. Per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict: single names produce small samples by design, so we only show timeframes with at least 30 trades, and the verdict lives at the system level below.
| Timeframe | Trades | Win rate | Profit factor | Avg hold (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5m | 697 | 63.3% | 1.12 | 14.3 |
| 15m | 246 | 59.4% | 0.91 | 14.1 |
| 30m | 130 | 60.0% | 0.99 | 12.3 |
| 39m | 111 | 66.7% | 1.25 | 10.9 |
| 60m | 79 | 57.0% | 0.62 | 14.1 |
| 78m | 59 | 62.7% | 0.91 | 12.6 |
| 120m | 50 | 68.0% | 1.08 | 10.1 |
| 130m | 31 | 71.0% | 2.27 | 9.5 |
Historical backtest data. Not a prediction, not financial advice. Members see the full per-symbol backtester on every name. How the backtester works.
Across every symbol we track, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own backtest, averaging +0.93% per trade over a roughly 17-day hold, era-stable at 67 to 71% through four very different markets. About 46% of signals never pulled back a full ATR, and those runners won roughly 92%. That distribution, not any single name, is why the setup earns a place on the board.
Yes. As of the last board update, Morgan Stanley (MS) is in a squeeze on 9 of 12 timeframes we track. A squeeze is a state, not a signal: it tells you compression is building, not which way price will go.
Our per-symbol numbers are the receipts, not the verdict. Across all symbols, the daily Slingshot entry won 69.1% of 5,852 trades since 2004 in our own historical backtest, era-stable at 67 to 71%. Small per-symbol samples are shown for transparency and are never a promise about the next trade.
The board sorts every name by backtest edge, timeframe confluence, and trend, nightly. $99/mo, cancel anytime.